Friday, November 6, 2015

Review: Samsung 850 Pro 2TB

Review: Samsung 850 Pro 2TB

Introduction

Performance or capacity. That's been the dichotomy that's dominated data storage since the first mainstream solid-state drives for PCs appeared nearly a decade ago.

But now Samsung has launched the first 2TB SSDs aimed at consumers. Give it up for the Samsung 850 Pro 2TB (£750, around US$1,166, or AUS$ 1,554), tested here, and its 850 Evo (£637, around US$992, or AUS$1,320) sibling. At last, the speed of solid-state flash memory has been combined with the multi-terabyte mass storage that's previously been the preserve of conventional hard drives with their spinning magnetic platters.

So, how has Samsung pulled it off? A big part of the explanation is Samsung's 3D V-NAND memory. 3D V-NAND, of course, is Samsung's trailblazing new flash memory technology that sees memory cells stacked atop one another in layers rather than just arranged in a flat two-dimensional array.

The most obvious benefit of that is the ability to squeeze much more capacity into a given area of memory chip. But the upsides go beyond that. For starters, using multiples layers of memory cells takes the pressure off the need for each layer to absolutely maximise capacity.

That means mature rather than cutting-edge silicon production processes can be used, which increases yileds and thus reduces costs. It also means the chips aren't right on the ragged edge for performance, which makes them more reliable – often a major limitation for flash memory which wears out gradually as data is written to the memory cells.

Samusng 850 Pro

In practice, that means where Samsung's previous-generation 840-series drives sported NAND memory with uber-tiny 19nm transistors, the 850 series is thought to get by with 40nm technology.

Samsung hasn't revealed whether the new 850 Pro in 2TB format uses the same 40nm 3D memory. But given the density enabled by stacking multiple layers, it's plausible that Samsung's existing 3D V-NAND technology is good enough.

However, what we do know is that achieving that headline 2TB has required Samsung to come up with a new controller chip. Samsung says its existing MEX controller as seen in the exisitng 128GB to 1TB 850 Pro SSDs had limitations when it comes to really high capacities. Consequently, the new 2TB has a new controller, known as the MHX.

As ever, actual technical details are thin on the ground. The market is so competitive, not many SSD makes are keen to give up the technical secrets of their controllers, sadly.

That said, Samsung's performance claims make it clear they don't think the upped capacity comes with any performance downsides. Samsung quotes exactly the same numbers for the new 2TB 850 Pro as existing Pros down to 250GB. So, that's 550MB/s sequential reads, 520MB/s sequential writes on the on e hand and 100,000 Read IOPS and 90,000 write IOPS on the other.

Arguably where things get really interesting with Samsung's 'Pro' line of drives, however, is durability. And here the 2TB absolutely does not disappoint. Samsung provides a mega 10-year warranty along with expectations of 300TB's worth of writes. Wow.

That's probably even more important with a really large drive than a puny SSD that you might expect to replace within a couple of years. This thing has legs.

Interface compatibility

Samsung 850 Pro 2TB

However, the elephant in the room and what we haven't mentioned up to this point is that the 2TB model and indeed all Samsung 850 Pro and Evo models don't offer compatibility with the latest storage interfaces.

We speak of PCI Express-based interfaces like M.2 and SATA Express (even is the latter is increasing looking like a stillborn standard). Instead, the 850 Pro 2TB is a plain old SATA drive.

That means it's limited to a real-world peak performance of about 550MB/s. That's simply a function of the 6Gbps limitation of the SATA interface. What's more, SATA uses a control protocal known as AHCI, which was conceived for magnetic hard drives, not SSDs. And that, in turn, makes SATA sub optimal in terms of random access performance with SSDs.

If you're upgrading an exisitng system – and particularly a laptop – that may not be a problem. You may not have any M.2 slots in your PC, in any case. But as the storage solution for a new PC you are planning to build or an existing system with M.2 support, the limitations of SATA compared with M.2 drives kicking out nearer 2GB/s of bandwidth than the mere 550MB/s top whack of a SATA drive make even this 2TB look pretty old hat.

Specifications and peformance

As for the actual performance of the new Samsung 850 Pro 2TB, it's all about expectations. Or rather, it's about managing expectations.

Thanks to its 2TB capacity, this isn't a cheap drive. In fact, predictably enough it's painfully pricey. If you therefore go in expecting it to render all asunder, you are in for a big disappointment.

If, on the other hand, you accept it for what it is, a very large SATA drive as opposed to a drive that's compatible with the latest super-fast PCI Express storage interfaces, you're liable to be much happier.

Samusng 850 Pro 2TB

Specifications

Here is the spec sheet provided to TechRadar:

  • Capacity: 2TB
  • Memory type: 3D VNAND
  • Controller: Samsung MHX
  • Interface: SATA 6Gbps
  • Form factor: 2.5-inch
  • Read / write performance: 550MB/s / 520MB/s
  • IOPS performance: 100,000 read, 90,000 write
  • Warranty: 10 years limited

Performance

Here's how the 850 Pro 2TB performs. In terms of raw sequential throughput, it'll do 559MB/s for read and 534MB/s for wirtes. In other words, it's simply bouncing off the limitations of the SATA interface.

As for random access performance, we're talking 41MB/s for reads and 133MB/s for writes, which are again as good as it gets for a SATA drive.

Benchmarks

Arguably more interesting is the fact that the 850 Pro 2TB clocks in with probably the fastest time we've seen for a SATA drive in our real-world 5GB file compression test. It's only a matter of a second or two, but it's further confirmation that this drive is about as good as it gets for SATA technology.

For context, the latest M.2 drives are up near 2GB/s for sequential reads and 200MB/s for 4k random writes. So how you view this drive's performance will ultimately come down to whether you're in the market for M.2 or SATA drives. It's great for a SATA drive, deathly slow in some departments compared to an M.2 drive.

Verdict

We liked

The sheer 2TB of the new Samsung 850 Pro is obviously its key defining feature. It means you no longer have to choose between a big but relatively dumb magnetic drive and a small but slick SSD. You can now have speed and capacity in a single drive.

Other highlights include the stellar endurance ratings, that awesome 10 year warranty and excellent performance for a SATA SSD.

We disliked

Apart from the fairly obvious fact that the Samsung 850m Pro 2TB is hideously expensive, it's also very conspicuously limited by its SATA interface.

Where the latest PCI Express-powered M.2 drives are kicking out nearly 2GB/s of raw bandwidth, the peak performance of this mega money SSD is closer to one quarter of that figure. Oops.

Final verdict

Prepare youself for the trotting out of cliches. For if ever there was a horses-for-course verdict, this is it.

Viewed in the broad context of all SSDs, the new Samsung 850 Pro 2TB is dead slow. The latest M.2 drives absolutely annihilate it for raw performance.

However, narrow the context down to SATA drives and it suddenly finds itself at the very top of the pack. So it really comes down to you buying needs and preferences. If you need the biggest and best SATA SSD for something like a laptop upgrade, this Sammy is a killer, albeit at a price.

PC Format is the magazine for PC gamers and hardware enthusiasts, created by geeks and gamers. Each issue covers the latest advances in graphics cards, processors, motherboards, memory, SSDs and complete systems. We also feature guides on overclocking, tweaking, system building, system modding and PC repair. Click here to subscribe.












from TechRadar: Technology reviews http://ift.tt/1ChjoPg

No comments:

Post a Comment